Reprice the line with rising loss ratio
When it may fit: A product grows but loses margin.
Evidence needed: Rate need and competitor pricing.
Trade-off: May lose volume.
Insurance Intelligence Brief
Different products and different channels produce different loss experience and different costs. A comparison on a common basis shows where growth is profitable and where it is not.
Which products and channels are making money, and which are growing at our expense?
Premium growth is rewarded in most organizations, but it comes from different places with different economics. A product or channel that is growing fast may be doing so by accepting poorer risks or paying higher commissions.
Comparing the loss ratio, expense and contribution of each product and channel, with the growth that goes with it, shows which growth is worth having.
A comparison table for each product or channel shows:
The most important pattern to look for is growth paired with a rising loss ratio.
The synthetic insurer is analyzed by product, and its pattern is the one to look for. Calculated Specialty & Umbrella grew premium 30.0%, the fastest, with a loss ratio of 61.5%, up 3.5 pts. Small Commercial grew 13.3% at 63.4%. Personal Auto grew 9.0%, but its loss ratio rose 8.8 pts to 74.3%, and its contribution fell from $10.7M to $8.70M.
Calculated Premium growth in Personal Auto contributed less profit, not more. The line grew by 9.0%, yet its contribution fell 18.7%. By contrast, Homeowners, Small Commercial and Specialty & Umbrella grew contribution by 2.2%, 5.7% and 19.0%, while all four lines lost some margin.
Hypothesis A channel analysis would likely show the same thing: some channels grow fast on thin or negative margins. Information gap The demo has no distribution-channel data. Adding channel to the table, with commission, loss ratio and retention for each, would show which channels to grow and which to fix.
4. Explore the interactive experience
Insurance Portfolio Explorer: a portfolio dashboard with loss, expense and combined ratios, a scenario simulator for rate, volume, frequency and severity, evidence-linked answers from APIS, and a sample brief, all on synthetic data.
The experience below is built on a synthetic insurer, “Demo Mutual Insurance,” analyzed by product line. It uses no policyholder or claims data of any kind, and it has no distribution-channel data, so product lines are used to show the method. Every figure is illustrative.
What to do depends on which product or channel is the problem.
Two Pillars can help carriers, agencies and brokerages investigate portfolio, claims operations, agency economics and process improvement using your own data. This demo uses no policyholder data. A good first step is a product and channel profitability table that pairs growth with loss experience.