Reprice weak routes
When it may fit: The route earns too little per mile after costs.
Evidence needed: Route-level cost and rate history.
Trade-off: Customers may leave.
Fleet Intelligence Brief
Revenue per load is easy to see and easy to misjudge. A load that pays well on paper can lose money once the miles, empty return and waiting time are counted.
A route pays well per load. Why does it not pay well per mile?
Dispatchers and brokers talk in rate per load. A longer, higher-paying load looks better than a shorter one, but profit depends on what it costs to run: loaded miles, the empty miles to reach it and return, fuel, driver time and waiting.
A route view that includes all of those shows which routes really earn money and which only look good.
Route profitability needs revenue and cost on the same basis:
A route earns a good return only if its contribution covers its share of fixed costs and leaves a profit.
The synthetic carrier shows why rate alone misleads. Calculated Port drayage earns $2.97 a mile with a contribution margin of 47.4%. Regional LTL earns only $1.75 a mile but a margin of 59.3%, the highest in the fleet. Cross-country spot earns $2.14 a mile, between them, but a margin of just 14.8%.
Calculated The trend is as important as the level. Spot revenue grew 12.5% and miles grew 14.5%, but its direct costs grew 21.1%, so contribution fell 20.0%. The route got bigger and less profitable at the same time.
Hypothesis The high margin on LTL, despite low rate per mile, probably reflects multiple pickups and drops per run, though the data cannot confirm it. Information gap Without load-level and dwell data, the demo cannot decompose a route’s margin further. The method is to rank routes by margin and by trend, not by rate.
4. Explore the interactive experience
Fleet Economics Dashboard: a lane-level dashboard with empty-mile share, a scenario simulator for rate, fuel, miles and empty miles, evidence-linked answers from APIS, and a sample brief, all on synthetic data.
The experience below is built on a synthetic carrier, “Demo Freight Co.,” analyzed by lane. It has no customer-level, vehicle-level or delivery-level records, so lanes are used to show the method. Nothing in it is real.
Route-level decisions follow from margin and trend.
Two Pillars can help carriers, fleet operators, brokers and logistics businesses investigate lane, vehicle, customer, cost and expansion economics using your own data. A good first step is a route profitability model that ranks routes on margin and trend.