Re-bid and consolidate vendors
When it may fit: Many vendors, little price discipline.
Evidence needed: Spend by vendor.
Trade-off: Service may suffer.
Real Estate Intelligence Brief
Maintenance is a large and diffuse cost. Looking at spend by vendor, by type of work and per unit shows where money goes and where it could go further.
Are we getting good value from what we spend on repairs and upkeep?
Maintenance spend is spread across many vendors, properties and kinds of work. Prices are often accepted without comparison, and emergency repairs cost more than planned work.
A review of spend by vendor, by property and by type, compared with units served, shows where costs are out of line.
A spend review uses these cuts:
Consolidating vendors and bidding larger packages usually lowers price, but quality and service level also matter.
In the synthetic portfolio, Calculated maintenance rose 17.4%, from $2.30M to $2.70M, against growth in occupied unit-months of 2.2%. Per occupied unit-month, maintenance rose from about $174 to about $200, up about 15%, and it accounted for 32% of the portfolio’s total expense increase.
Calculated By property, direct expenses grew fastest at Oak Ridge Commons (20.0%), Westgate Flats (18.8%) and Elm Court Townhomes (18.2%), and slowest at Midtown Lofts (10.0%) and Lakeside Residences (11.1%). A spend review would start where growth is highest.
Hypothesis Growth that varies this much between properties suggests that practices, vendors or building conditions differ, which a review could find. Information gap Vendor-level and work-order data are not in the demo. In the scenario, each 1% of maintenance cost is worth about $27K a year, so a 10% saving would be about $270,000.
4. Explore the interactive experience
Property Portfolio Dashboard: a property portfolio dashboard with occupancy and NOI, a scenario simulator for occupancy, rent and expenses, evidence-linked answers from APIS, and a sample brief, all on synthetic data.
The experience below is built on a synthetic eight-property portfolio, “Demo Property Group.” It has no vendor, work-order, tenant or location data, so it is used to show the property and cost picture. Nothing in it is real, and nothing in it is an investment recommendation.
Vendor management is often the fastest source of savings.
Two Pillars can help property owners, operators and investors examine property performance, expenses, investment scenarios and portfolio strategy using your own data. Nothing here is an investment recommendation. A good first step is a vendor and maintenance spend review that benchmarks cost per unit across properties.