Professional Services Intelligence Brief
How to Evaluate Client Concentration Risk
Concentration builds quietly as a strong client grows. Measure how much of your fees and profit depend on a few clients, and test what would happen if one left.
Short answer
Client concentration risk is the exposure a firm has when a large share of fees, and a larger share of profit, comes from a few clients. Measure it by fees and by contribution after direct cost, then stress-test the loss of the largest client given costs that cannot be cut quickly. The SEC’s description-of-business rule lists dependence on key customers among the topics a registrant may need to describe, and for smaller reporting companies it lists dependence on one or a few major customers,[1] which shows how seriously regulators and investors treat the issue. Reduce the risk by broadening the client base, deepening relationships and lengthening commitments.
What is client concentration risk?
Concentration risk is the vulnerability of a firm to the loss or shrinkage of a small number of clients. It builds quietly: a strong client grows, the firm serves it well and its share of fees rises. Nothing looks wrong until the client changes advisers, merges, cuts its budget or brings the work in-house. The danger is not only the revenue lost but the profit lost, because salaries and premises cannot be reduced as quickly as fees disappear. The effect is largest when the client is also the most profitable one.
Regulators treat the issue as significant. In the SEC’s Regulation S-K, the description of a registrant’s business lists dependence on revenue-generating activities, key products or services, or customers among the topics to cover, and for smaller reporting companies the list includes dependence on one or a few major customers.[1] Your firm is probably not a registrant, but lenders, buyers and investors ask the same question, and the way they ask it is a useful model: how many customers account for how much of the business?
How do you measure it?
Compute three views for the last twelve months. First, share of fees: the percentage of total fees from the largest one, three, five and ten clients. Second, share of contribution: fees less the direct cost of serving each client, expressed as a share of total contribution. Third, trend: how those shares have changed over three years. Share of contribution deserves special attention. Lake Ridge Bank’s description of customer profitability analysis notes that a company’s largest customers usually fall in one of the two extremes, either very profitable or costly to serve because of special requests, deep discounts and demands on delivery.[2]
| Group | Share of fees | Share of contribution | Average length of relationship |
|---|---|---|---|
| Largest client | Calculate | Calculate | Years |
| Top 3 clients | Calculate | Calculate | Years |
| Top 10 clients | Calculate | Calculate | Years |
| All other clients | Calculate | Calculate | Years |
Add qualitative information for each large client: contract terms and notice periods, the number of contacts and sponsors, the health of the client’s own business, whether alternatives are available to them and whether you are on a competitive list. A client that pays 20 percent of fees on a rolling 30-day contract with a single sponsor is a different risk from one on a three-year agreement with several sponsors.
How do you stress-test the loss of a large client?
Model the effect on profit if the largest client left tomorrow, then if it halved its work. Start from your income statement. Remove the client’s fees and the variable costs that would disappear with it, such as subcontractors and direct expenses. Then consider labor: Pragmatic Institute distinguishes fixed costs, which do not change proportionally with volume in the short or medium term, semi-fixed costs, which change in steps when volumes pass thresholds, and variable costs, which move quickly with sales.[3] Salaries are usually semi-fixed: you can reduce them, but only after a delay and with severance, redeployment and morale costs.
As an invented illustration, suppose a firm earns 3.0 million dollars of fees and 0.6 million of profit, and its largest client accounts for 0.6 million of fees and 0.3 million of contribution after direct cost. If the client leaves and the firm cannot reduce labor for six months, profit falls by the full 0.3 million contribution immediately, which is half the firm’s profit, before any cost-cutting. The exercise shows how a client with 20 percent of fees can account for 50 percent of profit.
Include cash. The Federal Reserve’s 2024 Small Business Credit Survey found that 51 percent of employer firms cited uneven cash flows and 56 percent cited paying operating expenses as challenges, so many firms have little buffer.[4] Estimate how many months of cash the firm could survive if the client left, and whether it could meet payroll while rebuilding revenue.
How can you reduce the risk?
There are four levers. Diversify: set a target for the maximum share of fees or contribution from any one client, such as 15 or 20 percent, and direct business development toward replacing concentration with a broader base. Deepen: build relationships with several people at the client, in more than one department, so that the relationship does not depend on a single sponsor. Lengthen: seek longer contracts, retainers or minimum commitments, and add notice periods that give time to adjust. Keep costs flexible: use subcontractors or flexible arrangements for the part of the capacity that serves the largest client, so that cost falls when the work does.
Price for the risk. A client that is both large and unprofitable should be repriced or restructured; a large, profitable client that creates concentration deserves protection, including service-level attention and regular executive contact. See our guide on investigating unprofitable client relationships for the method.
What should leadership monitor?
Add concentration to the monthly dashboard: share of fees and contribution for the top three clients, contract end dates in the next twelve months and the pipeline for replacement work. Review each large client every quarter, using a short checklist: relationship health, upcoming changes at the client, competitive threats, satisfaction and growth opportunities. Revisit the stress test each year. Concentration is not always bad; some firms choose to specialize in a few anchor clients, but they should do it knowingly, with the numbers in front of them.
Frequently asked questions
What is a safe level of client concentration?
There is no universal threshold. Many firms set an internal limit, such as 15 to 20 percent of fees from any one client, based on their cash buffer and ability to cut costs; the right level depends on the stress test.
Why measure contribution as well as fees?
Because the largest clients are often at the extremes of profitability. Lake Ridge Bank notes that big clients are either very profitable or cost the business a lot of money.[2]
Do regulators care about customer concentration?
The SEC’s Regulation S-K description-of-business rule lists dependence on key customers, and on one or a few major customers for smaller reporting companies, among the topics to describe.[1]
How do I reduce concentration quickly?
Add clients through targeted business development, expand services to smaller clients, negotiate longer contracts with the large ones and keep costs flexible.
Can a large client be a good thing?
Yes, if it is profitable, the relationship is deep and contracts are long. The aim is to know the risk, price it and plan for the loss.
What to do next
- Calculate share of fees and share of contribution for your top ten clients.
- Stress-test the loss of the largest client, including cash.
- Set a concentration limit and a plan to reach it.
- Add concentration and contract end dates to your monthly dashboard.
Optional · interactive example
See it in an interactive example.
Firm Economics Dashboard: a service-line dashboard with utilization and realization, a scenario simulator for hours, rate and cost, evidence-linked answers from APIS, and a sample brief, all on synthetic data.
The experience below is built on a synthetic firm, “Demo Advisory Partners,” analyzed by service line. It has no client-level, pipeline or business development records, so service lines are used to show the method. Nothing in it is real.
- In the Scenario tab, the preset lowers billable hours by 10%, a stand-in for losing a large client. Note the profit effect.
- Add a 3% rise in realized rate. Could pricing offset the loss?
- Ask APIS how sensitive profit is to a drop in hours.
Understand Your Firm’s Economics and Growth Opportunities
Two Pillars helps professional services firms investigate profitability, capacity, pricing and growth using the firm’s own data and a structured assessment process. A good first step is a client and growth review that shows how concentrated your revenue is, which clients and services earn the most, and where the next dollar of growth is most likely to come from.
Sources
- Cornell Legal Information Institute (17 CFR 229.101), Regulation S-K Item 101, Description of business. Accessed October 2026.
- Lake Ridge Bank, Customer Profitability Beyond the 80/20 Rule with the Whale Curve (March 29, 2023). Accessed October 2026.
- Pragmatic Institute, Maximizing Profitability with a Whale Curve (Bauder). Accessed October 2026.
- Federal Reserve Banks, 2025 Report on Employer Firms: Findings from the 2024 Small Business Credit Survey. Accessed October 2026.
Sources checked October 2026. This guide is general information for the leaders of professional services firms and is not legal, accounting, tax or financial advice. Figures and rules are cited to the sources below and may have changed since they were accessed, so confirm anything you rely on against the current source. Two Pillars & Co is independent of the organizations cited. See our editorial policy.
